MISLEADING
Claims about the UK budget contained multiple factual errors and misrepresentations. Various claims about tax increases were exaggerated or misattributed, viral posts confused proposed and actual measures, and spending figures were routinely taken out of context. While the budget did include significant tax changes, the scale and scope were frequently distorted in social media discourse.
The UK's Autumn Budget 2024, delivered by Chancellor Rachel Reeves on October 30, 2024, became a focal point for widespread misinformation. According to official HM Treasury documents, the budget included 40 billion pounds in tax increases, with major changes to employer National Insurance contributions and capital gains tax. However, as documented by Full Fact, numerous false and misleading claims circulated online, including exaggerated figures, misattributed policies, and confusion between proposed and enacted measures. This report examines the most prevalent false claims and provides the verified facts.
The False Claims
Claim 1: "The Largest Tax Increase in History"
A widely circulated claim stated that the 2024 budget represented "the largest tax increase in British history." While the budget did include substantial tax rises, the Institute for Fiscal Studies noted that measuring "largest" depends heavily on the metric used. [6] When measured as a percentage of GDP, the tax burden increase was significant but not unprecedented compared to historical budgets, including those following World War II and during the 1970s fiscal crises.
Claim 2: "Income Tax Raised on Working People"
Multiple viral posts claimed that "Labour has raised income tax on ordinary workers despite their election promise." According to the official budget documents, income tax rates for employees were not changed. [1] The confusion arose from the increase in employer National Insurance contributions (NIC), which is paid by businesses, not employees directly. Full Fact clarified that while this may have indirect effects on wages and prices, it is technically not a tax increase on workers' pay slips. [13]
Claim 3: "Inheritance Tax Will Force Families Out of Their Homes"
Claims circulated suggesting that "the budget will force ordinary families to sell their homes to pay inheritance tax." Full Fact investigated and found this claim to be misleading. [8] The inheritance tax threshold remained at 325,000 pounds, with an additional 175,000 pounds residence nil-rate band for family homes passed to direct descendants. Combined with the spousal exemption, a couple can pass on up to 1 million pounds tax-free to their children, including the family home.
Claim 4: "Fuel Duty Increased by 10p Per Litre"
Social media posts claimed fuel duty had increased dramatically in the budget. Full Fact's analysis confirmed this was false. [10] The 5p fuel duty cut introduced in 2022 was maintained, and the planned inflation-linked increase was again frozen. However, the government did announce the 5p cut would not be extended beyond March 2025, which was misrepresented as an immediate increase.
Actual Budget Details
According to HM Treasury's official budget documentation and the Office for Budget Responsibility's fiscal outlook, the key measures included: [1] [3]
| Measure | Change | Revenue Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Employer NIC Rate | 13.8% to 15% | +25bn/year by 2029-30 |
| NIC Secondary Threshold | Reduced from 9,100 to 5,000 | Included in above |
| Capital Gains Tax (Lower Rate) | 10% to 18% | +2.5bn by 2029-30 |
| Capital Gains Tax (Higher Rate) | 20% to 24% | Included in above |
| Inheritance Tax Threshold Freeze | Extended to 2030 | +2bn by 2029-30 |
The BBC's budget analysis confirmed that personal income tax rates remained unchanged at 20% (basic), 40% (higher), and 45% (additional), and the personal allowance remained frozen at 12,570 pounds. [4]
Expert Analysis
Economic experts provided nuanced assessments that contrasted sharply with viral claims. The Institute for Fiscal Studies described the budget as "a significant fiscal event" but noted that claims about unprecedented tax burdens were context-dependent. [6] IFS Director Paul Johnson stated that while taxes were rising to historically high levels as a share of GDP, this trend had begun under the previous Conservative government.
The Office for Budget Responsibility provided independent analysis showing that the budget's tax measures would raise the tax-to-GDP ratio to 38.2% by 2029-30, the highest since records began in 1948. [3] However, the OBR also noted this included the continuation of fiscal drag policies inherited from the previous government.
The Bank of England's Monetary Policy Report assessed that the budget would add approximately 0.5 percentage points to inflation in the near term, but this was significantly lower than some viral claims suggesting inflation would double. [14]
According to Reuters and the Financial Times, the employer NIC increase was structured to protect smaller businesses through an increased Employment Allowance from 5,000 to 10,500 pounds. [7] [9] This meant that 865,000 employers would pay no NIC at all, and over 1 million would pay the same or less than before, a detail almost entirely missing from viral criticism.
The Misinformation Amplification
The spread of budget misinformation followed predictable patterns. Full Fact documented that false claims typically emerged within hours of the budget announcement, often before official documents were fully published. [2] Political opponents from multiple parties amplified misleading interpretations, while some claims appeared to originate from deliberate misreadings of technical documents.
According to The Guardian's analysis, several viral posts confused proposed measures that were discussed before the budget but not included (such as a wealth tax) with actual enacted policies. [5] Others conflated devolved policy announcements from Scotland and Wales with UK-wide measures.
The Telegraph's coverage noted that within 48 hours of the budget, at least 15 distinct false claims had gone viral, ranging from exaggerated tax figures to entirely fabricated policies. [12] Corrections from official sources and fact-checkers consistently received less engagement than the original false claims.
Conclusion
The misinformation surrounding the UK's Autumn Budget 2024 demonstrates how complex fiscal policy can be distorted in online discourse. While the budget genuinely included significant tax increases, particularly on employers through National Insurance contributions, the scale and impact were routinely exaggerated or misrepresented.
Key facts that were obscured by viral claims include: personal income tax rates remained unchanged; the majority of small businesses were protected through increased Employment Allowance; the inheritance tax threshold was frozen but not reduced; and fuel duty did not immediately increase. According to the House of Commons Library's analysis, the budget represented substantial fiscal policy changes but within established democratic and parliamentary processes. [16]
Claims about the UK budget contained multiple factual errors and misrepresentations. Various claims about tax increases were exaggerated or misattributed, viral posts confused proposed and actual measures, and spending figures were taken out of context. While legitimate criticism of the budget exists, informed debate was undermined by the volume of false and misleading claims that dominated social media discourse in the days following the announcement.